You have entered the Pathfinder's decision tree for choosing
approaches to behaviour analysis.
Behavioural
research is carried out using a variety of methods, e.g. laboratory
experiment, field experiment, econometric analysis, etc., in order to
understand how actors (organizations or individuals) make decisions,
and how those decisions vary according to contextual factors. The
insights derived from such applications can then be drawn upon in order
to explain decisions in other situations, e.g. why individuals might
purchase lottery tickets when the expected value of doing so is
negative. In the domain of CCVIA, the application of these methods is
based on the assumption that knowledge of what drives individual
decision making is necessary in order to advance adaptation. For
example, understanding factors explaining household decisions on flood
risk reduction measures can help improve the design of flood risk
communication strategies. The application of these methods is discussed
in the Toolbox
section on Behavioural analysis, here we
develop criteria for identifying the critical tasks and selecting
methods of behavioural analysis.
It may be noted
that behaviour analysis tasks and methods are closely related to
decisionanalytical method described in the
Pathfinder's
section on Appraising adaptation options, as they
may employ similar assumptions about actors’ choice
processes. However, these types of methods can be differentiated
fundamentally from one another on the basis of their goals. Behaviour
analytical tasks and methods are descriptive, that is they seek to
identify (empirical or theoretical) models that
“realistically” describe observed behaviour.
Conversely, decision-analytical tasks and methods are prescriptive,
that is they seek to identify measures that are optimal under some
decision criteria irrespective of whether this
“optimal” behaviour can be observed in practice.
The first decision to address is whether it is succificient to describe actors and behaviours.
If this is the case, the next task is behaviour description. If it is not sufficient to describe actors and behaviours,
further distinctions have to be made in the subsequent steps.
This section is based on the UNEP PROVIA guidance document |
1. | You want to identify adaptation measures. | |
2. | Your focus is on public actors and on individual actions. | |
3. | The actors' potential capacity is high, but the private actors are not adapting autonomously. | |
4. | Adaptation would not conflict with private interests. | |
5. | As a next step you are faced with the question whether it is succificient to describe actors and behaviours. |