The purpose of monitoring and the principles underlying it will act as a guide to the design of
the monitoring plan, the kind of information being sought and the nature of the approach used.
These could thus cover a number of aspects, such as:
- progress in the achievement of stated tasks
- whether the tasks fulfil the aims of the adaptation initiative including addressing
questions such as 'are the tasks in the adaptation plan leading to a reduction in
vulnerability to climate hazards', as appropriate
- the functioning of the team and individuals within it
- engagement of other people in the process
- stakeholders perspective on the nature of that engagement (process and
content)
- how well learning is being captured and brought into the process to inform next
steps
Regular, on-going checking of different aspects of the project is important to keep the project on
track and capture surprise or unanticipated changes as they arise. Danny Burns, in his account
of running systemic action research approaches, suggests asking the following questions at
each new stage of a process (Burns, 2010):
- How is it going? Are there issues arising that need our attention?
- Are we still on track with our underlying (research) purposes?
- Do our purposes need to alter?
- What new questions do we need to ask?
- What new inquiries do we need to open up?
- What new data do we need to collect?
- What new action do we need to take?
- What practices and methods do we need to use at this stage?
- What outputs or feedback do we need at this stage (if any)?
No sophisticated tools or methods are required to do this although some of the visual,
Participatory Learning and Action tools (see the Toolbox section on
Participatory evaluation tools) may help in drawing out more tacit
knowledge, sharing understanding and prioritising areas for further inquiry.