You are here: Home / Case studies / CLIMSAVE
case: external location: Europe sectors: multiple

Question

Which question has been addressed in this step?

Exploring risks: What regions of Europe are vulnerability hotspots after adaptation to climate change?

Case step navigator: click any node to select the respective step

Why has this question been chosen?

  • Future impacts and the ability of society to proactively respond to expected impacts and to cope with actual impacts are not spatially uniform. It is important therefore to understand those regions which are vulnerable to climate change in order to facilitate policy responses.
  • Identification of both the causes, including crosssectoral impacts, and location of climate vulnerability provides essential information which is needed to be able to identify potential solutions that target appropriate policy responses to areas where these are most needed.

Which methods have been applied?

  • The stages within the CLIMSAVE IA Platform have been developed to lead the User from the identification of potential impacts (i.e. climate and/or socio-economic impacts in the absence of adaptation) through to residual impacts (impacts after adaptation, taking into account socioeconomic specific constraints). Vulnerability represents residual impacts in excess of the socioeconomic specific coping capacity, which is itself a function of the availability of capitals (financial, manufactured, social, human and natural). Vulnerability is defined in terms of human well-being and is assessed using a range of ecosystem service indicators.

Why have these methods been selected?

  • The CLIMSAVE IAP further develops methods from previous studies by considering multiple stresses (environmental and socio-economic pressures) and multisectoral responses to vulnerability.

What results have been obtained?

  • Results will only be available in 2013!

Reflections on this step

  • -


Details on this case study step



[no further details on this step available]