City module - Urban GHG emission database
|
Cities are the place where most people live, yet it is still a matter of debate what portion of current GHG emissions is associated to urban areas. Numbers vary from 30% to 80%, depending on the methodology and whether production or consumption-based emissions are accounted for (Hoornweg et al, 2011).
Important messages of the study Using the charts application quickly shows the breadth of per capita values. For example, the ICLEI dataset indicates how cities in the same country (India) diverge by factor 100 - despite using the same method. In addition, this small selection of published studies indicates the lack of studies for cities in less and least developed countries - a gap that is challenging yet important to fill in order to get a global overview of how cities GHG emissions relate to factors such as wealth, density, size, population, and their economies. It is crucial to understand which city datasets are comparable, and which are not. In this module, only city inventories originating from the same study can be compared, while city inventories originating from different studies can not. What are assumptions and other reasons that limit the use of the results? A proposal for a principal standard for urban emission inventories has recently been suggested by a number of authoritative institutions on the matter. However, for currently existing inventories a multitude of methodologies have been and are still in use, ranging widely in terms of the area, sector or emission(s) of interest, the precision of the methodologies applied, and in how far the inventories abided by the methodology and traceably documented the input, methods and findings in the published results. The literature and its urban emissions figures considered for this study reflect this heterogeneity, which are a source of dispersion. How was the data prepared/analysis performed? CO2e emission figures were retrieved from collections of urban GHG emission inventories published in peer reviewed journals or reports from research institutes and non-governmental organizations. Published figures were largely drawn from primary sources such as city inventories covering emissions in their territories. If necessary, figures were traced back to their original publication source for verification. References Brown, M.A., Southworth, A., Sarzynski, A. (2008): Shrinking the Carbon Footprint of Metropolitan America. Brookings Institute Metropolitan Policy Program, Washington D.C. Carbon Map of the UK (2007), Data Sheet - http://www.carbontrust.co.uk/news/news/press-centre/2007/Pages/010607_Carbon_map.aspx; Data extracted from: Dore, C.J. et al. (2006): UK Emissions of Air Pollutants 1970 to 2005. - http://naei.defra.gov.uk/reports.php. Carney, S., Green, N., Wood, R., Read, R. (2009): Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories for Eighteen European Regions, EU CO2 80/50 Project Stage 1: Inventory Formation. The Greenhouse Gas Regional Inventory Protocol (GRIP). Dhakal, S. (2009): Urban energy use and carbon emissions from cities in China and policy implications, Energy Policy; doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.020. Hoornweg, D., Sugar, L., Gomez, C. L. T., 2011. Cities and greenhouse gas emissions: moving forward. Environ. Urban. 23 (1), 207-227. ICLEI-South Asia: Local Governments for Sustainability (2009): Energy and Carbon Emissions Profiles of 54 South Asian Cities. New Delhi. Kennedy, C.A., Steinberger, J. et al. (2009a): Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Global Cities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 7297-7302 - http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/es900213p. Sovacool, B.K., Brown, M.A. (2010): Twelve metropolitan carbon footprints: A preliminary comparative global assessment. Energy Policy 38, pp. 4856-4869. |